Home arrow Latest Articles arrow Editor takes a bow for story which changed British politics

This Website

Nicholas Jones has spent forty years chronicling the news media’s relationship with politicians, trade union leaders and other prominent people.

He is an active campaigner in groups which promote high journalistic standards and the widest possible spread of media ownership.

There could hardly be a more opportune moment to widen the debate about the need to restore trust in the political process.  Press freedom is an essential cornerstone of Britain's democratic traditions and it imposes responsibilities on both journalists and the government of the day.

This archive provides:

o A first-hand insight into the often hidden world inhabited by those who control the flow of information from the state to the public.

o An explanation of the way in which governments and political parties seek to communicate via newspapers, television, radio and the internet.

o An ongoing critique about a worrying decline in journalistic standards.

o A persuasive argument as to why ensuring that all sections of the media have equal access to the same information at the same time would help restore trust and strengthen the democratic process.

As the author of a range of books which tackle this critical subject, including Strikes and the Media (1986), Soundbites and Spin Doctors (1995), Sultans of Spin (1999) and Trading Information: Leaks, Lies and Tip-offs(2006), Jones hopes his archive of articles, speeches and book reviews will provide a valuable resource not only for students of politics and the media but also for any organisation or individual seeking to devise a communications strategy.

After serving a long apprenticeship on local and national newspapers (The News, Portsmouth, Oxford Mail and The Times), Jones spent thirty years as a BBC industrial and political correspondent (1972-2002).

As perhaps was only to be expected, once he began writing and commentating on how politicians manipulate the media - and vice versa - Jones incurred the wrath of political spin doctors, government information officers and journalists themselves. Many resent his ongoing attempt to penetrate the elusive, off-the-record encounters and liaisons which over the years have proved so mutually beneficial to aspiring journalists and up-and-coming politicians.

Nonetheless, despite being regarded by both sides as a nuisance, Jones believes that by the simple act of seeking to be inclusive rather than selective in the distribution of data, and allowing equal access not just to the media but also to pressure groups, bloggers and the like, the state could reinvigorate what Clem Attlee always hoped would be the people’s “conscious and active participation in public affairs”.

Jones has been a life-long member of the National Union of Journalists (1960); he sits on the national council of the Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom ; is a supporter of Mediawise ; and a trustee of the Journalists’ Charity (chairman 2005-6).

He writes on media affairs for a wide range of publications, including Free Press, the magazine of the CPBF and the website Spinwatch, which monitors pr and spin.

Editor takes a bow for story which changed British politics Print E-mail
A gripping account of what it felt like to be editor when the Daily Telegraph broke the scandal of MPs’ expenses had even hardened reporters sitting on the edge of their chairs at the annual lunch of the Journalists’ Charity at Simpson’s in The Strand (2.3.2010).William Lewis, now editor in chief of Telegraph Media Group, said that initially he feared the story was a hoax and he was not completely convinced until the Justice Secretary Jack Straw finally confirmed that the purloined disc, which contained details of all the claims, was genuine. Chris Boffey, chairman of the Journalists’ Charity, said it was an honour for the charity to hear from an editor who had demonstrated the necessity for “a strong free press to hold the souls of our political masters to the fire of public opinion”.After only three years in the editor’s chair Lewis admitted he was not “overly keen” on the story to begin with. The suggestion that a knight of the realm was claiming on MPs’ expenses for a duck house seemed as ridiculous as the infamous Hitler Diaries hoax.The disc had already been touted around and the Daily Telegraph was in fact the fifth newspaper to be offered a chance to buy it.  Lewis believed the scepticism of their editorial team served them well because it ensured their approach to the story was rigorous and meticulous. He was in no doubt that the results of their investigation last year “changed politics in Britain forever” and triggered a “a very British revolution” because a Speaker was forced to quit for the first time in 300 years.During questions Lewis agreed that the legacy of the Daily Telegraph’s story was that it contributed to a break down in trust between politicians and the voters. He thought it extraordinary that neither of the two main political parties had “sealed a deal” with the electorate. The narrowing in the polls contained a blunt message for party leaders.“If you want us to vote for you, you need to tell us what we will get for our votes...Please list the five things you will do otherwise you won’t get my vote”. Nicholas Jones 2.3.2010.       
 
< Prev   Next >